BRAINSTORMING an ETHICAL ARGUMENT TOPIC
BRAINSTORMING FOCUS
WRITING
STYLE: Ethical
Argument
TOPIC:
Genetic
Engineering
ETHICAL
STANDARD: Christian
Worldview
|
Thesis to generate
ideas:
Genetic
engineering is unethical from a Christian stand-point due to manipulation of
God’s image at the cellular level, idolizing superficial and ever-changing
beauty standards, as well as death and pain to the embryos, clones, and
experimental lives along the way to perfecting this scientific goose-chase.
|
- Christians believe sin entered
the world due to man's own fall...removal from Eden and sin entered the
world
- With this sin came death,
destruction, tumultuary earth, and disease.
- Having sinfulness, illness, and
strife makes people turn to God for guidance, healing, and ultimately,
peace if death does come.
- God gave humans items on the
Earth for healing and easing of pain.
- With big
pharma entering the picture, use and advocating for these natural
remedies has been hidden, pushed aside, laughed at, and often, outlawed.
- Modern scientists state this
genetic engineering is for healing.
- Laboratory manipulation at the
microscopic level is not for healing...not really...if the experts in the
field say it requires 'death' of embryos, shortened lifespans for cloned
and mutated organisms, and future ramifications are unpredictable--and so
it is for glory, vanity, and the wealthy...not for health.
- Manipulation of others, causing
pain, discomfort, death, and pushing one's will onto
someone else who has no say (embryos or future generations) is not ethical
for Christians.
- Beauty is in the eye of the
beholder...what does that old adage really mean?
- What is perceived as beautiful
is not really measurable.
- Beauty is subjective--meaning
there is not set 'constant’ for with which to judge.
- After all, what one person
finds beautiful may be objectional to another.
- What one society or culture
sees as desirable may be seen as demonic or—at the least—ugly.
- Idolizing perceived human
perfections is not only unbiblical, but it also is not glorifying to
God.
- If it is unbiblical, then it
is not ethically sound for Christians.
- Christians believe they are
made in God's image.
- Designing beauty alters that
basic image at the cellular level to become the latest trend in beauty in
society.
- 40 years ago, perceived beauty
was very different than what is seen as beautiful today.
- This is transitive, and if the
world's view of beauty is ever-changing, then why would parents want to
alter someone at the genetic level to have a beauty that might be out of
style in 40 years?
- It's not like a tattoo one can
get removed.
- It is not like dying your hair
a new shade.
- Beauty designed at the
cellular level will not end with the ones originally altered.
- Their kids will now have that
altered DNA, and those people will look 'out of style' if given time.
Basic Ethical Foundation for Christianity: Love, Acceptance, and Forgiveness
- Diversity makes people
appreciate their blessings, help others who struggle in ways they do not,
and leads them closer to God.
- As people grow as Christians,
they consider..." Hmm, if God loves me this way...with all of my
imperfections, sins, and ugliness, then I will need to try to love this
other person...warts and all."
- The human manifestation of God
on Earth came in the form of Jesus, and He did not seek the
beautiful. He did not seek the healthy. He did not
seek the powerful and strong.
- He sought the average
man. The common woman.
- He sought the weak, sick, and
possessed.
- He sought the servants and
givers.
- Manipulating unwanted diversity
traits out of humans go against the belief system and ethical guidance
found in the Bible.
© J. Lynn H. Dick, 2019
For Educational Purposes Only
JDick13@liberty.edu
|
SAMPLE 2:
2. God gave each life a clear purpose, and even with the sin of the world causing less-than-desirable traits at times, God has a plan for that life, faults and all.
3. The ‘golden rule’ (do to others as you would have them do to you) is essential for every scientist to live by since it relates to interpersonal relations with other humans.
4. Opposition: Many scientists, and the governments that sponsor their experiments, feel genetic engineering is ethical, but it is not.
SAMPLE INTRODUCTION:
Scientists
should not attempt to modify or attempt to change babies in any way. The fruition of man’s version of a “perfect
human” is not worth the risk to human life. There are things on this earth
that man should not tamper with, even if society considers it a ‘grey area’
of morality. God’s views of perfection
are above all man-made desires, and since The Bible is the ethical
standard for Christians, it is through this book that one can learn what is
perfect. Scientists must stop all
genetic modification because The Bible declares that God specifically
designed each human, gives each one a purpose, and that the ‘golden rule’
must be adhered to by all men for unity on Earth.
|
The Break Down of the INTRODUCTION:
Scientists should not attempt to modify or
attempt to change babies in any way. The fruition of man’s version of a
“perfect human” is not worth the risk to human life. There are things on this
earth that man should not tamper with, even if society considers it a ‘grey
area’ of morality. God’s views of
perfection are above all man-made desires, and since The Bible is the
ethical standard for Christians, it is through this book that one can learn what
is perfect. Scientists must stop all genetic
modification because The Bible declares that God specifically designed
each human, gives each one a purpose, and that the ‘golden rule’ must be
adhered to by all men for unity on Earth.
|
- Continue to NARROWING YOUR IDEAS (for the ethical argument)
- Continue to COMMON MISTAKES
- Continue to You've Got a Paper to Write
- Continue to: The Difference Between Morals and Ethics
- Continue to STEPS-TO-SUCCESS
© J. Lynn H. Dick, 2020
For Educational Purposes Only
JDick13@liberty.edu
|
No comments:
Post a Comment